Derek Thomas Accuses Rumer Willis of Blocking His Daughter’s Smile

**# Rumer Willis’ Ex Accuses Actress of Blocking Access to Their 3‑Year‑Old Daughter**

The day Thursday, court documents filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court revealed that Derek Richard Thomas, the former partner of actress Rumer Willis, is alleging the actress has actively prevented him from seeing their daughter, Louetta.

Thomas claims that Willis, 38, has “done everything in her power to interfere, block and frustrate my relationship with Louetta.” The filing states that Willis has blocked several instances where Thomas sought to visit.

Thomas’s declaration also counters Willis’s earlier accusations of drug abuse while caring for Louetta.

“I reject completely and without reservation Respondent’s claims concerning my alleged abuse of drugs, any conduct on my part that endangers Louetta, and any failure at efforts to cooperate with her and to co‑parent Louetta,” Thomas wrote. A representative for Willis did not respond to a request for comment.

## Background & Context

In June of the previous year, Willis was granted primary physical custody of their 3‑year‑old daughter after she accused Thomas of domestic violence.

The parties agreed to a custody evaluation and joint custody, with Thomas initially granted supervised visits every other weekend that would transition into overnight visits without supervision. Both parents were ordered to attend co‑parenting counseling and to communicate through a designated co‑parenting platform.

Willis’s claims in May included allegations of “incessant domestic violence” and a “persistent pattern” of emotional abuse. She described a “persistent pattern” of “insane emotional abuse” in front of Louetta, asserting that Thomas engaged in prolonged verbal attacks that lasted over six hours at a time on a daily basis.

Willis said these attacks aimed to isolate her from friends and family and called her a liar without reason.

Willis also had support from her mother, Demi Moore, who detailed how Thomas allegedly “appears to want to dictate and control Rumer’s environment to his needs.” Moore claimed she overheard Thomas berating Willis shortly after Louetta’s birth.

Thomas denied these allegations, asserting that Willis threatened to “destroy” him the day of the birth.

## What People Are Saying

Thomas’s filing presents a stark contrast to Willis’s prior accusations. He denies any drug use or conduct that could endanger the child and insists he has made every effort to cooperate with co‑parenting arrangements.

Willis’s allegations center on domestic violence and emotional abuse, suggesting that these behaviors have traumatized Louetta, causing her to “cry a lot.” The court documents do not contain any statements from Willis herself; instead, they reflect her claims as presented in the legal filings.

The absence of a response from Willis’s representative leaves the public with only Thomas’s perspective on the current dispute. Meanwhile, the custody order remains in place, and both parties are required to adhere to supervised visits and co‑parenting counseling as mandated by the court.

## Analysis

The filings underscore a contentious co‑parenting battle that began when the couple met in 2022 and ended two years later. The legal framework established in June has created a structured, yet potentially fragile, system of supervised visitation and mandatory counseling.

Thomas’s recent declaration indicates a perceived breakdown in this arrangement, suggesting that Willis’s alleged interference may be obstructing his ability to maintain a relationship with Louetta.

Given the ongoing nature of the case and the lack of a definitive resolution, it is unclear how the court will address Thomas’s claims of obstruction. The court will likely weigh Thomas’s assertion against Willis’s prior allegations of domestic violence and emotional abuse.

The outcome will have significant implications for both parents’ custody rights and for Louetta’s well‑being.

In the meantime, Willis has recently moved from Los Angeles to Nashville, a development that may influence future visitation logistics. The legal process remains active, and observers will watch to see how the court navigates these competing claims.