Todd Bridges Wins $20,000 Domain Battle, Adultery Clause Shocks

**Todd Bridges and Bettijo Hirschi’s Prenup Forces Divorce Drama Over Digital Property and Debt**

Todd Bridges, the former star of *Diff’rent Strokes*, is in the throes of a divorce from his estranged wife, Bettijo B. Hirschi. The pair, married in 2022, filed for dissolution on March 31 after announcing their split earlier that year.

Court documents reveal a highly detailed prenuptial agreement that governs every aspect of the separation, from alimony to digital property.

The prenup is only enforceable under specific circumstances: an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, incompatibility of temperament, and no possibility of reconciliation or adultery by either spouse. This clause has become a focal point as both parties navigate the legal maze.

Under the agreement, neither Bridges nor Hirschi are obligated to provide spousal support once the marriage ends. Each spouse retains ownership of earnings accrued during the union—salaries, bonuses, gifts, dividends, and other income—and any joint bank account is treated as shared property while individual accounts remain separate.

The contract also includes a disability clause that waives any promise of lifelong care in the event of disability. Health‑insurance responsibilities and debt obligations are split equally; each must obtain coverage and notify the other at least ten days before filing for bankruptcy.

## Background & Context

Bridges and Hirschi wed in 2022 after meeting during a shared charity event. Their marriage lasted roughly three years before the couple publicly announced their separation in January of the current year.

Though they have no biological children together, both are parents to children from prior marriages—Bridges has two from his first marriage, while Hirschi brings four children into the family.

The couple’s divorce filing on March 31 cites a “marriage broken beyond repair” after attempts to resolve issues. , Bridges alleged the relationship had become irreparable, prompting the formal petition. No alimony is being requested, in line with the prenup’s stipulations.

Both parties are also co‑parenting children from previous relationships, which the prenup addresses separately. The agreement designates the wife as having sole control over the children outside the marriage, while the husband agrees not to interfere in their upbringing.

This arrangement reflects an effort to keep child custody arrangements distinct from marital financial matters.

## Prenup Provisions

The prenuptial agreement contains a disability clause that explicitly states neither spouse pledges lifelong care if either becomes disabled during the marriage. The contract also eliminates any obligation for spousal support upon dissolution, ensuring both parties can maintain financial independence.

Earnings generated during the marriage—including salaries, bonuses, gifts and dividends—remain separate property of each individual.

Assets and debts acquired while married are treated as separate responsibilities for each spouse. The agreement requires that if either party files for bankruptcy, they must notify the other in writing at least ten days before any legal action.

Joint bank accounts are classified as shared property, whereas personal accounts remain individual.

In the event of divorce, neither spouse is obligated to pay or provide for the other, precluding any alimony. Each person retains ownership of their own financial earnings, and the prenup specifies that all income—including salaries, bonuses, personal payments, gifts, dividends, distributions and other revenue—remains theirs individually.

Health insurance costs after separation are also each spouse’s sole responsibility.

The agreement also contains child‑custody provisions for children from previous relationships. It states the husband acknowledges that the care and direction of those children outside the marriage is in the sole exclusive control of the wife.

The husband further agrees not to interfere with or obstruct her authority in decision‑making regarding those children.

## Current Disputes

On August 5, Hirschi filed a court motion seeking ownership, branding and management rights for the website *realtoddbridges.com* through her company Loop 101 LLC.

She values the domain at slightly over $20,000 and offers Bridges the option of paying $20,720 in full for ownership or waiving the fee in exchange for full control or permanent termination of the site.

Hirschi threatens to terminate the site if Bridges does not respond in writing within 30 days. Until then, she will host the site for a monthly fee of $40 covered by merchandise sales; if revenue falls short, she will invoice the difference.

Should the site generate more than $4,000 in annual net profits, remaining earnings will be split 50/50.

Hirschi also contests joint credit‑card debt that stood at $18,275.87 at separation. She seeks a court order requiring Bridges to reimburse her $9,187.94—the half balance—after she paid off the card in full.

Additionally, she claims Bridges owes her $3,164 for half of their 2025 IRS tax debt, while he is owed $8.00 for half of state refunds totaling $16.00 that were initially received by Hirschi.

Reps for both Bridges and Hirschi have not responded to inquiries about the financial claims. The divorce proceeding continues, with both parties still engaged in legal discussions over property, debt and digital assets. No final judgment has been issued yet.

The saga of Todd Bridges and Bettijo Hirschi illustrates how modern divorces can be entangled with complex financial arrangements and digital properties. As the court documents show, the parties are locked in a legal battle that extends far beyond marital dissolution.

Observers will watch to see how the prenup clauses and disputed assets ultimately resolve.